Please take a moment to consider a donation.
Thank you.
Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts
Jan 1, 2015
donation
Please take a moment to consider a donation.
Thank you.
Jul 12, 2014
quote
I would like to share the following quote.
"Even students of wrongful conviction might be surprised to learn that the most common contributor to wrongful convictions across all crimes represented in the Registry is perjury or false accusation, present in 55 percent of the exonerations."
National Registry of Exonerations June Report: Record-Breaking Pace in 2014, Causal Insights
The Wrongful Convictions Blog
by Nancy Petro
July 7, 2014
Dec 3, 2013
Former CPS Investigator Exposes CPS's Tactics, Kidnapping, and Corruption
Oct 22, 2013
Tanya Marrhoubi-Sadowsky, Parent Testimony
http://youtu.be/ZiamQU8JPgk
* * *
The Amanda Truth Project
(web page & blog)
* * *
see also:
“Maybe It Wasn’t Child Abuse”
The Paralegal Society
* * *
The Amanda Truth Project
(web page & blog)
* * *
see also:
“Maybe It Wasn’t Child Abuse”
The Paralegal Society
Aug 20, 2012
Sep 26, 2013
Why I no longer wish to identify as a mental health professional
I would like to share an article that I have come across.
Nashua Patch
by Kevin Kervick
September 14, 2013
Sep 14, 2013
AFR News: In re Yohan K. and Marika K., 2013 IL App (1st) 123472 (June 19, 2013)
I would like to share a post from AFR News that just became aware of. In re Yohan K. and Marika K., 2013 IL App (1st) 123472 (June 19, 2013) was published on June 29, 2913 by Leonard Henderson.
The above mentioned post links to a PDF of a 49-page appellate court opinion - In re Yohan K., 2013 IL App (1st) 123472 - which I have added to the PDF section of this blog.
Sep 8, 2013
Mother Threatened for Feeding Baby Goat’s Milk Instead of GMO-Soy Formula
by: Christina Sarich
August 16, 2013
* * *
related story:
by: Nok-Noi Ricker
Sep 6, 2013
Preemptive Removal in UK Due to Learning Disability
I would like to share a blog post -
from reformtalk.net.
Aug 13, 2013
Presumed guilty until proven innocent...even then you're still guilty
I would like to share a piece by Carey Roberts - Presumed guilty until proven innocent ... even then you're still guilty - which was published June 8, 2011 on RenewAmerica.com. (Other pieces by Mr. Roberts on RenewAmerica.com can be found here.)
_____ _____ _____
This past Thursday men and women from around the country convened to share their experiences facing down false allegations of abuse. The event was a sobering testament to how the former War on Crime has morphed into Open Season on the Innocent, or so it would appear.
The meeting was the first-ever False Allegations Summit, held in Washington, DC and sponsored by a group called Stop Abusive and Violent Environments. Yes, there were anguished sighs and tears as persons recounted their daily battles — for some, obsessions — to exonerate themselves and restore their good names.
The Summit led off with the revelation that 11% of Americans report they have been falsely accused of child abuse, domestic violence, or sexual assault. This astonishing number means tens of millions of persons have had their foreheads branded with the scarlet Abuser label.
The Summit then featured presentations by a parade of stakeholder organizations that have witnessed first-hand the effects of false claims.
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers highlighted the "immense, often irreparable harm caused to our clients for false allegations, not only to reputation and personal relationships, but often to the accused individual's livelihood and even health."
The Home School Legal Defense Association documented repeated instances where an anonymous hotline call triggered an unannounced visit by a social worker, sometimes ending in the strip search of a bewildered child. These are not isolated cases — nationwide, over 85% of child abuse allegations are found to be unsubstantiated: http://www.saveservices.org/false-allegations-awareness-month/
The meeting was the first-ever False Allegations Summit, held in Washington, DC and sponsored by a group called Stop Abusive and Violent Environments. Yes, there were anguished sighs and tears as persons recounted their daily battles — for some, obsessions — to exonerate themselves and restore their good names.
The Summit led off with the revelation that 11% of Americans report they have been falsely accused of child abuse, domestic violence, or sexual assault. This astonishing number means tens of millions of persons have had their foreheads branded with the scarlet Abuser label.
The Summit then featured presentations by a parade of stakeholder organizations that have witnessed first-hand the effects of false claims.
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers highlighted the "immense, often irreparable harm caused to our clients for false allegations, not only to reputation and personal relationships, but often to the accused individual's livelihood and even health."
The Home School Legal Defense Association documented repeated instances where an anonymous hotline call triggered an unannounced visit by a social worker, sometimes ending in the strip search of a bewildered child. These are not isolated cases — nationwide, over 85% of child abuse allegations are found to be unsubstantiated: http://www.saveservices.org/false-allegations-awareness-month/
The American Coalition for Fathers and Children then testified how an allegation of child abuse or domestic violence often becomes a tactical ploy for an impending child-custody dispute. "When a father can be sentenced to months in jail for simply leaving a gallon of milk on his child's doorstep, we have indeed reached the point of 'hysteria' about the issue of domestic violence," ACFC executive director Michael McCormick commented.
The National Coalition for Men representative recounted the plight of Raul, a ship-welder who was caught in an unhappy marriage with an abusive woman. She began to accuse him of a litany of offenses including sexual abuse of their baby. As the conflict escalated, the woman's family started to threaten the man. Just two weeks ago, Raul was discovered lying in the California desert, a gunshot wound to the head.
Then Encounters International described how so-called Green Card Girls play the abuse card to secure their work authorization and citizenship. Recalling her childhood experiences in the former Soviet Union, Natasha Spivack told the spell-bound audience:
"In Stalinist Russia, innocent people were presumed guilty if reported as 'Enemies of the Motherland.' They were sent to the Gulag or executed without due process. In the United States of America, citizens are presumed guilty if reported as 'Domestic Abusers'....they lost their jobs, their mental health, their reputation, their trust in justice, and their self-esteem."
Then it was then the turn of the victims, the persons falsely accused, to speak out and break the shroud of silence and shame that too often envelopes the lives of the wrongfully charged.
Cheryl Shanks of New Jersey recounted how her former husband fabricated claims of abuse so he could get special treatment by the immigration authorities: "This ordeal began in August of 2003...The price on my family has been immeasurable. My son has his own therapist who he sees weekly."
Carl Starling of Maryland described how his former wife accused him of repeatedly striking her with his fist, but didn't experience the need to pay a visit to the hospital emergency room to tend to her wounds.
Gordon Smith of Delaware described the Mad-Hatter experience of having an abusive wife who sought to be absolved by accusing him of the very actions that she had committed. When he sought to file perjury charges, the prosecutor demurred, leading Smith to deplore the "state-sponsored protection" of false accusers.
And Terri Quick of Pennsylvania described the ordeal of her son who had engaged in consensual sex with a girlfriend. When the relationship went sour and she decided to re-connect with her previous flame, he suddenly found himself accused of rape. The evidence was all circumstantial, but enough to secure a conviction.
But it was Ben Vonderheide of Pennsylvania who stole the show: http://www.saveservices.org/2011/06/video-false-allegations-summit-in-america-do-the-accused-deserve-a-hearing/
The National Coalition for Men representative recounted the plight of Raul, a ship-welder who was caught in an unhappy marriage with an abusive woman. She began to accuse him of a litany of offenses including sexual abuse of their baby. As the conflict escalated, the woman's family started to threaten the man. Just two weeks ago, Raul was discovered lying in the California desert, a gunshot wound to the head.
Then Encounters International described how so-called Green Card Girls play the abuse card to secure their work authorization and citizenship. Recalling her childhood experiences in the former Soviet Union, Natasha Spivack told the spell-bound audience:
"In Stalinist Russia, innocent people were presumed guilty if reported as 'Enemies of the Motherland.' They were sent to the Gulag or executed without due process. In the United States of America, citizens are presumed guilty if reported as 'Domestic Abusers'....they lost their jobs, their mental health, their reputation, their trust in justice, and their self-esteem."
Then it was then the turn of the victims, the persons falsely accused, to speak out and break the shroud of silence and shame that too often envelopes the lives of the wrongfully charged.
Cheryl Shanks of New Jersey recounted how her former husband fabricated claims of abuse so he could get special treatment by the immigration authorities: "This ordeal began in August of 2003...The price on my family has been immeasurable. My son has his own therapist who he sees weekly."
Carl Starling of Maryland described how his former wife accused him of repeatedly striking her with his fist, but didn't experience the need to pay a visit to the hospital emergency room to tend to her wounds.
Gordon Smith of Delaware described the Mad-Hatter experience of having an abusive wife who sought to be absolved by accusing him of the very actions that she had committed. When he sought to file perjury charges, the prosecutor demurred, leading Smith to deplore the "state-sponsored protection" of false accusers.
And Terri Quick of Pennsylvania described the ordeal of her son who had engaged in consensual sex with a girlfriend. When the relationship went sour and she decided to re-connect with her previous flame, he suddenly found himself accused of rape. The evidence was all circumstantial, but enough to secure a conviction.
But it was Ben Vonderheide of Pennsylvania who stole the show: http://www.saveservices.org/2011/06/video-false-allegations-summit-in-america-do-the-accused-deserve-a-hearing/
In 2007 his ex-girlfriend was found guilty of three counts of making false statements to law enforcement officials. Despite the conviction, the ex- continues her campaign to vilify dad in the eyes of her son, and family judges refuse to lift a finger to stop the calumnies. "You're presumed guilty until proven innocent, and even then you're still considered guilty," Vonderheide wryly told the audience.
Are things as bad in the United States as they were in Soviet Russia? Of course not.
But accounts of anonymous informants, a galling presumption of guilt, ideologically driven prosecutions, a no-way-out criminal justice system, and the tacit condoning of perjury all point to an abuse industry that is spinning out of control.
© Carey Roberts
Are things as bad in the United States as they were in Soviet Russia? Of course not.
But accounts of anonymous informants, a galling presumption of guilt, ideologically driven prosecutions, a no-way-out criminal justice system, and the tacit condoning of perjury all point to an abuse industry that is spinning out of control.
© Carey Roberts
Jul 26, 2013
May 6, 2013
Apr 12, 2013
Apr 10, 2013
Nov 14, 2012
A Primer: All About Waste and the Wizard of Oz
The post A Primer: All About Waste and the Wizard of Oz, on Family Court in Amercia is something that needs to be looked at. The section highlighted is quite disturbing.
Sep 1, 2012
family falsely accused of SBS
On August 16, 2012, the Marilyn Stowe Blog published a story How to deal with every parent's nightmare. (Simply click on the link to view the story & the video that I have re-posted here.) This story covers the horrors experienced by the Nevin family (David, Julie, & their son Reilly).
Aug 3, 2012
Outrage: hospital 'kidnaps,' injects newborn, expels mom
I would like to share a
piece by Gina Miller - Outrage: hospital 'kidnaps,' injects newborn, expels mom - which was published August 2, 2012 on
RenewAmerica.com. (Other pieces by Ms. Miller on RenewAmerica.com
can be found here.)
_____ _____ _____
There is certainly no shortage of examples of so-called "authorities" in our nation grossly overstepping their bounds and trampling the rights of ordinary citizens who are oftenpowerless to stop them. We see stories of this almost daily. Just recently we have seen a Christian in Phoenix sentenced to jail for holding Bible studies in his own home, and in Oregon, a man was sentenced to jail for collecting rainwater on his private property.
Now, we have another nightmarish incident in which the power Nazis will hopefully be held accountable, thanks to a lawsuit filed by the nonprofit advocacy Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA).
The story dates back to June of 2010 when a Pennsylvania woman, Jodi Ferris, went into labor earlier than expected. She and her husband Scott had planned on her having their baby at home with a midwife, but due to the early labor, the midwife recommended she take an ambulance to the hospital. Jodi delivered her baby girl, "Annie," in the back of the ambulance in the Hershey Medical Center parking lot.
Hospital staff admitted Jodi and her baby for observation, and as reported by HSLDA Chairman Michael Farris,As any mother would do, Jodi immediately began to ask the nurses and attendants how her baby was doing. The hospital staff was utterly unresponsive. When they started to give Jodi an injection, she asked what it was and what it was for. They gave her vague answers like, "It's just to help." Only after giving her the injection of oxytocin did they tell her what it was and then asked, "You aren't allergic to that are you?"
Jodi persisted in asking about Annie. No one would tell her anything other than "she's in good hands and you'll be able to see her soon."
Eventually a doctor told her that Annie scored a 9 on a physical exam applied to newborns known as the APGAR test. A score of 8 or higher is considered healthy. (It is unclear when the score was given since she was in the ambulance at birth.) But shortly after this a different doctor told Jodi that Annie was "very sick" and would need to stay in the hospital. This doctor's comments were accompanied by an explanation of his disdain for midwives saying, "Too many people think they know what they're doing."
About an hour later, another hospital staffer finally brought Annie to Jodi and said, "The baby is doing good. She will be able to go home in no time."
Well, that did not happen. Later another staff member told Scott and Jodi that Annie would need to be kept for 48 to 72 hours for observation, and when asked why, the staffer told them the law requires that the baby be kept, although such a law does not exist in Pennsylvania. Apparently the hospital's "risk management" department was not worried about Annie, who was perfectly healthy, but rather worried about the hospital being sued if something went wrong with the baby after being discharged.
The story kept getting worse, as Mr. Farris reported,Late in the afternoon, a government social worker named Angelica Lopez-Heagy came into Jodi's room announcing that she was there to conduct an investigation. Jodi asked to know the allegations. The social worker claimed that it would be against the law for her to show Jodi the allegations.
Jodi replied that she would not be comfortable answering the questions if she couldn't know the allegations. Immediately the social worker proclaimed, "Since you're not going to cooperate, I'll just go and call the police and we can take custody of the baby."
Fearing that the social worker would carry out her threat, Jodi replied that she was willing to cooperate.
The social worker soon intimated that the issue was Jodi's refusal to consent to medical treatment for the baby. Jodi replied that she had no idea why anyone would say that. The social worker claimed that she had refused to allow a Vitamin K shot for Annie. Jodi replied that no one had asked her about such a shot. Moreover, she had overheard hospital staffers saying that they had already given Annie such a shot.
Neither the social worker nor any hospital staffer ever gave Jodi or Scott any example of any medically necessary treatment that they had refused for Annie.
At this point, Scott left the hospital to tend to their older children who were staying with friends.
Here we have another social worker Nazi. Child "protective" services workers are notorious for abusing their authority. Just do an Internet search of "child protective services abuse of power" and you'll get an eyeful of the shameful behavior of too many of these people.
The hospital staff asked to run some tests on Annie, and Jodi agreed, but then they wanted to give Annie a Hepatitis B shot, and Jodi wanted to have her or the baby tested for Hepatitis B before letting them give Annie the shot, but the hospital staff claimed that they forgot to do the test earlier, and at that time it was too late in the day to do the test.
Then, as Mr. Farris wrote,When the social worker pressed her to make an immediate decision about this shot, Jodi asked her if they could simply wait until Scott got back before they decided.
Put yourself in Jodi's shoes at this moment. You gave birth that morning in an ambulance. The hospital has made wild and conflicting claims about your baby's health all day long. You are exhausted. You are in pain. Your husband has gone to check on your children. And a social worker who has threatened to take your baby into police custody is standing in your hospital room demanding that you make an immediate decision.
Jodi simply said, "Please can't this wait until my husband gets back[?]"
The social worker renewed her threat. If Jodi would not answer her question right then, she would call the police. And then the social worker started adding conditions. She and Scott would have to agree to sign a safety plan before she could conclude her investigation.
Jodi said that she wanted her husband and an attorney to look at the plan. She felt she was in no position to read such a document and really understand what she was being pressured to sign.
And then the story turns ugly.
The social worker left the room and called the police. Without a court order they took custody of Annie, immediately claiming that she was suffering from illness or injury — a patently false claim.
The social worker consented to the administration of the Hepatitis B shot even though no blood test had been done.
The police made Jodi Ferris get up out of her hospital bed and escorted her to the entrance — they were expelling her from the hospital because she had not signed the "safety plan."
Scott met her at the entrance to the hospital. The police escorted them both off of the grounds of the hospital.
Jodi was told that she would be allowed to return every three hours to nurse the baby through the night.
Jodi and Scott were forced to spend the night that she had given birth in their car in a nearby parking lot. You read that right. They kicked this mother out of the hospital, and in order to be close enough to feed her child, she had to sleep in the car.
To add insult to injury, Jodi was given access to Annie only sporadically and not every three hours.
This is an astonishingly horrible story! I just cannot imagine having to deal with a Gestapo-like social worker and such bizarre treatment by a hospital staff!
It was the next day that a judicial officer held a hearing, and after learning all the facts, immediately returned baby Annie to her parents — but not before the hospital staff gave her at least one injection without the consent of her parents.
Although this is not a home schooling case, the HSLDA has stepped up to hold this hospital, the social worker and the police accountable for their reprehensible treatment of the Ferrises and their baby. In March of this year the HSLDA filed a lawsuit in federal court arguing that the actions of Hershey Medical Center, the social services woman and the police officers violated the Fourth and 14th Amendment rights of Scott and Jodi Ferris.
As the HSLDA's Mr. Farris stated,No parents should be put through this kind of ordeal. It is not a crime to ask questions about the well-being of your child. It is not a crime to ask for testing to ensure that a procedure is needed before it is done. It is not a crime to be a protective mom.
It is a moral offense of the highest order to kick a mother out of a hospital and to seize her child on the day of her birth simply because a mom wanted to have her husband read a legal document before she signed.
Both the medical personnel and the social worker engaged in outrageous behavior toward this family.
And we believe that they violated their rights under the Constitution of the United States. And we are going to court to prove it.
... We are taking this case because we are tired of seeing the erosion of parental rights in virtually every area of life. Parental rights in medical cases have an impact on broader parental rights, including educational decisions.
And the plain fact is this: If we don't fight for parental rights, it is probable that our rights will be eroded bit by bit until there is nothing that remains.
... When government workers run over parents in cases like this, the lesson that needs to be taught is to the government.
... All of our families are at risk when the government is allowed to run over one of us. When we stand together, we can fight back for freedom and for truth.
Thanks for giving as the Lord leads you. And pray for us. This is not an easy case. We really need your ongoing prayers.
You can read Mr. Farris' entire report at the HSLDA website, where you can also donate to help fund their valuable work for the Ferrises and other victims of an out-of-control government bureaucracy.
© Gina Miller
Now, we have another nightmarish incident in which the power Nazis will hopefully be held accountable, thanks to a lawsuit filed by the nonprofit advocacy Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA).
The story dates back to June of 2010 when a Pennsylvania woman, Jodi Ferris, went into labor earlier than expected. She and her husband Scott had planned on her having their baby at home with a midwife, but due to the early labor, the midwife recommended she take an ambulance to the hospital. Jodi delivered her baby girl, "Annie," in the back of the ambulance in the Hershey Medical Center parking lot.
Hospital staff admitted Jodi and her baby for observation, and as reported by HSLDA Chairman Michael Farris,As any mother would do, Jodi immediately began to ask the nurses and attendants how her baby was doing. The hospital staff was utterly unresponsive. When they started to give Jodi an injection, she asked what it was and what it was for. They gave her vague answers like, "It's just to help." Only after giving her the injection of oxytocin did they tell her what it was and then asked, "You aren't allergic to that are you?"
Jodi persisted in asking about Annie. No one would tell her anything other than "she's in good hands and you'll be able to see her soon."
Eventually a doctor told her that Annie scored a 9 on a physical exam applied to newborns known as the APGAR test. A score of 8 or higher is considered healthy. (It is unclear when the score was given since she was in the ambulance at birth.) But shortly after this a different doctor told Jodi that Annie was "very sick" and would need to stay in the hospital. This doctor's comments were accompanied by an explanation of his disdain for midwives saying, "Too many people think they know what they're doing."
About an hour later, another hospital staffer finally brought Annie to Jodi and said, "The baby is doing good. She will be able to go home in no time."
Well, that did not happen. Later another staff member told Scott and Jodi that Annie would need to be kept for 48 to 72 hours for observation, and when asked why, the staffer told them the law requires that the baby be kept, although such a law does not exist in Pennsylvania. Apparently the hospital's "risk management" department was not worried about Annie, who was perfectly healthy, but rather worried about the hospital being sued if something went wrong with the baby after being discharged.
The story kept getting worse, as Mr. Farris reported,Late in the afternoon, a government social worker named Angelica Lopez-Heagy came into Jodi's room announcing that she was there to conduct an investigation. Jodi asked to know the allegations. The social worker claimed that it would be against the law for her to show Jodi the allegations.
Jodi replied that she would not be comfortable answering the questions if she couldn't know the allegations. Immediately the social worker proclaimed, "Since you're not going to cooperate, I'll just go and call the police and we can take custody of the baby."
Fearing that the social worker would carry out her threat, Jodi replied that she was willing to cooperate.
The social worker soon intimated that the issue was Jodi's refusal to consent to medical treatment for the baby. Jodi replied that she had no idea why anyone would say that. The social worker claimed that she had refused to allow a Vitamin K shot for Annie. Jodi replied that no one had asked her about such a shot. Moreover, she had overheard hospital staffers saying that they had already given Annie such a shot.
Neither the social worker nor any hospital staffer ever gave Jodi or Scott any example of any medically necessary treatment that they had refused for Annie.
At this point, Scott left the hospital to tend to their older children who were staying with friends.
Here we have another social worker Nazi. Child "protective" services workers are notorious for abusing their authority. Just do an Internet search of "child protective services abuse of power" and you'll get an eyeful of the shameful behavior of too many of these people.
The hospital staff asked to run some tests on Annie, and Jodi agreed, but then they wanted to give Annie a Hepatitis B shot, and Jodi wanted to have her or the baby tested for Hepatitis B before letting them give Annie the shot, but the hospital staff claimed that they forgot to do the test earlier, and at that time it was too late in the day to do the test.
Then, as Mr. Farris wrote,When the social worker pressed her to make an immediate decision about this shot, Jodi asked her if they could simply wait until Scott got back before they decided.
Put yourself in Jodi's shoes at this moment. You gave birth that morning in an ambulance. The hospital has made wild and conflicting claims about your baby's health all day long. You are exhausted. You are in pain. Your husband has gone to check on your children. And a social worker who has threatened to take your baby into police custody is standing in your hospital room demanding that you make an immediate decision.
Jodi simply said, "Please can't this wait until my husband gets back[?]"
The social worker renewed her threat. If Jodi would not answer her question right then, she would call the police. And then the social worker started adding conditions. She and Scott would have to agree to sign a safety plan before she could conclude her investigation.
Jodi said that she wanted her husband and an attorney to look at the plan. She felt she was in no position to read such a document and really understand what she was being pressured to sign.
And then the story turns ugly.
The social worker left the room and called the police. Without a court order they took custody of Annie, immediately claiming that she was suffering from illness or injury — a patently false claim.
The social worker consented to the administration of the Hepatitis B shot even though no blood test had been done.
The police made Jodi Ferris get up out of her hospital bed and escorted her to the entrance — they were expelling her from the hospital because she had not signed the "safety plan."
Scott met her at the entrance to the hospital. The police escorted them both off of the grounds of the hospital.
Jodi was told that she would be allowed to return every three hours to nurse the baby through the night.
Jodi and Scott were forced to spend the night that she had given birth in their car in a nearby parking lot. You read that right. They kicked this mother out of the hospital, and in order to be close enough to feed her child, she had to sleep in the car.
To add insult to injury, Jodi was given access to Annie only sporadically and not every three hours.
This is an astonishingly horrible story! I just cannot imagine having to deal with a Gestapo-like social worker and such bizarre treatment by a hospital staff!
It was the next day that a judicial officer held a hearing, and after learning all the facts, immediately returned baby Annie to her parents — but not before the hospital staff gave her at least one injection without the consent of her parents.
Although this is not a home schooling case, the HSLDA has stepped up to hold this hospital, the social worker and the police accountable for their reprehensible treatment of the Ferrises and their baby. In March of this year the HSLDA filed a lawsuit in federal court arguing that the actions of Hershey Medical Center, the social services woman and the police officers violated the Fourth and 14th Amendment rights of Scott and Jodi Ferris.
As the HSLDA's Mr. Farris stated,No parents should be put through this kind of ordeal. It is not a crime to ask questions about the well-being of your child. It is not a crime to ask for testing to ensure that a procedure is needed before it is done. It is not a crime to be a protective mom.
It is a moral offense of the highest order to kick a mother out of a hospital and to seize her child on the day of her birth simply because a mom wanted to have her husband read a legal document before she signed.
Both the medical personnel and the social worker engaged in outrageous behavior toward this family.
And we believe that they violated their rights under the Constitution of the United States. And we are going to court to prove it.
... We are taking this case because we are tired of seeing the erosion of parental rights in virtually every area of life. Parental rights in medical cases have an impact on broader parental rights, including educational decisions.
And the plain fact is this: If we don't fight for parental rights, it is probable that our rights will be eroded bit by bit until there is nothing that remains.
... When government workers run over parents in cases like this, the lesson that needs to be taught is to the government.
... All of our families are at risk when the government is allowed to run over one of us. When we stand together, we can fight back for freedom and for truth.
Thanks for giving as the Lord leads you. And pray for us. This is not an easy case. We really need your ongoing prayers.
You can read Mr. Farris' entire report at the HSLDA website, where you can also donate to help fund their valuable work for the Ferrises and other victims of an out-of-control government bureaucracy.
© Gina Miller
Dec 24, 2010
re: Poca
While this case is old, it (and the places I found the information in) seems to be worth sharing.
The following five posts are from Decoupling: Washington Family Law Blog.
You can find additional information (news links) re: the story of Poca on The Foster Care Justice Alliance, under their Foster Care Horror Stories section.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)